PCMH 2017: How can more frequent reporting mean less work for practices?

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Email this to someone

“How is annual reporting in the new 2017 PCMH standards less work for practices than the old 3-year PCMH Recognition cycle was?”

That may be the most common question we get at PCMH Education & Training events.

See the frank, funny answer from PCMH faculty Bill Tulloch and Mina Harkins at the June 13, Introduction to PCMH 2017 training in Washington, DC.

Michael Braaten
Michael Braaten is the video and Communications Specialist at NCQA and has been with the organization since 2016. He supports NCQA’s external communications for the consumer audience and public and private stakeholders.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *